Feature comparison overview

Compare Seedream 5.0 Flash and Recraft V4.1 Flash across the features that matter most, from what each one accepts as input to editing, resolution, speed and cost.

Feature
Developed by
What it does
Best for
Inputs
Takes an image in
How you target an edit
Layer output
Text in images
Resolution
Speed
Extra controls
Prompt length
Model pricing
Pricing in Picsart
In Picsart
Seedream 5.0 Flash
ByteDance Seed
Generates, edits the spot you mark, and returns layers
Directed edits and layered, still-editable output
Text, one or more reference images
Yes
Draw on it freehand, or pass a point or box on a 0-999 grid
Up to 16 editable layers as transparent PNGs
Native multilingual text rendering
Not published; layers return at 1K, 1.5K or 2K
Not published - ByteDance states only that it is faster than Pro
Freehand marking, coordinates, layer extraction
Not published
Not published - stated to cost less than Pro
Credit-based
AI Playground
Recraft V4.1 Flash
Recraft
Turns text into a raster image, and nothing else
Fanning out many options fast and cheap
Text only
No - text-to-image only
Not applicable, it does not edit
Not offered
Not published
1K raster
About 1.3 seconds - 1.4 s median, 1.8 s at the 95th percentile
Colour and background colour
Up to 10,000 characters
$0.007 per image
Credit-based
AI Playground






Seedream 5.0 Flash vs Recraft V4.1 Flash FAQ

Recraft V4.1 Flash only generates - it turns text into an image and does not accept an image as input. Seedream 5.0 Flash generates too, but it also edits an area you mark on an existing picture and can return a design as separate layers. If your work starts from a blank page and you want lots of options quickly, Recraft Flash. If there is a picture to change, Seedream Flash.